Peer review
In the first read we can appreciate
that the article is well structured and has a concept precision and specification
allowing to the reader to get the correct idea quickly without many readings of
the same paragraph.
The subjects are consistent
with the conclusions means the writing of the text is coherent and cohesive, we
can see this if we pay attention to the way people learn, some important things
about the language encourage by tasks and other exercises and at the end of the
article the author says that besides the improvement that means this technique “is
still in its infancy”
One of the main issues of
the text is that the extension is really short so it has some holes in the
information specifically for an ignorant reader, maybe the writer could use
some more words to expose the ideas or with more examples, they could give a
better picture of what is planted on the article.
In the 6th
paragraph the writer uses way too many paraphrases so it makes the paragraph
itself hard to read because it requires that the reader go for another paper to
fully understand this article.
Greetings.
Karla Gallegos
Matías Barría